<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumerism and Beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Beversluis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Beversluis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Eh, some of those dour Calvinist ancestors of mine have it coming to them.

&quot;To many, total abstinence is easier than perfect moderation.&quot;

-Saint Augustine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, some of those dour Calvinist ancestors of mine have it coming to them.</p>
<p>&#8220;To many, total abstinence is easier than perfect moderation.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Saint Augustine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manolo the Shoeblogger</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolo the Shoeblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>The Manolo he did not mean this as the slight against the Protestants, rather it was only to note that the rise of Protestant iconoclasm in the West it has had the consequence of introducing the idea that beauty=frivolity=work-of-the-devil.

Of the course, this it is only the minority of the belief of Protestantism, and indeed one can extend the list of Protestant beauty-makers (which the Mike he has begun) to a very long length. 

By the way, many thanks to those who have left the most kind remarks about the humble blatherings of the Manolo.  And special thanks it must be given to the Baron, for his perceptive questions and responses, and for recognizing that it is the spirit of civility and comity that should prevail in this place.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Manolo he did not mean this as the slight against the Protestants, rather it was only to note that the rise of Protestant iconoclasm in the West it has had the consequence of introducing the idea that beauty=frivolity=work-of-the-devil.</p>
<p>Of the course, this it is only the minority of the belief of Protestantism, and indeed one can extend the list of Protestant beauty-makers (which the Mike he has begun) to a very long length. </p>
<p>By the way, many thanks to those who have left the most kind remarks about the humble blatherings of the Manolo.  And special thanks it must be given to the Baron, for his perceptive questions and responses, and for recognizing that it is the spirit of civility and comity that should prevail in this place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dowdydiva</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>dowdydiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hey, those protestants weren’t/aren’t all bad; eg, Bach, the Shakers, African/American gospel, or American culture in general. Sure, there’s a little contradiction with the Puritan impulse, but isn’t that what creative tension is about? In any case, I’m sure “Hearts to God, Hands to Work” has resulted in some very nice shoes.&quot;

Dang it, Mike!  That&#039;s what I was going to say!  Not to mention Scandinavian design of all sorts.  But I get at the heart of what Manolo is trying to say, and agree whole-heartedly.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey, those protestants weren’t/aren’t all bad; eg, Bach, the Shakers, African/American gospel, or American culture in general. Sure, there’s a little contradiction with the Puritan impulse, but isn’t that what creative tension is about? In any case, I’m sure “Hearts to God, Hands to Work” has resulted in some very nice shoes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dang it, Mike!  That&#8217;s what I was going to say!  Not to mention Scandinavian design of all sorts.  But I get at the heart of what Manolo is trying to say, and agree whole-heartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Beversluis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Beversluis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Hey, those protestants weren&#039;t/aren&#039;t all bad; eg, Bach, the Shakers, African/American gospel, or American culture in general.  Sure, there&#039;s a little contradiction with the Puritan impulse, but isn&#039;t that what creative tension is about?  In any case, I&#039;m sure &quot;Hearts to God, Hands to Work&quot; has resulted in some very nice shoes.

Also, it seems like Manolo&#039;s social calender can be as full as he wants it to be.  Not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, those protestants weren&#8217;t/aren&#8217;t all bad; eg, Bach, the Shakers, African/American gospel, or American culture in general.  Sure, there&#8217;s a little contradiction with the Puritan impulse, but isn&#8217;t that what creative tension is about?  In any case, I&#8217;m sure &#8220;Hearts to God, Hands to Work&#8221; has resulted in some very nice shoes.</p>
<p>Also, it seems like Manolo&#8217;s social calender can be as full as he wants it to be.  Not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonji</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>sonji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Oh, I am so in love with the big brain and the fashion sense of the Manolo.  He is super fantastic for real. Not only has the Manolo inspired my soul so early in the morning, he has also provided words that I must look up in the dictionary.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I am so in love with the big brain and the fashion sense of the Manolo.  He is super fantastic for real. Not only has the Manolo inspired my soul so early in the morning, he has also provided words that I must look up in the dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baron</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>The Baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Maestro Manolo, 

Truly, again, we are most impressed with your skill with words. The appreciation for items of beauty, no matter what their providence, is something we both share. Beauty is the food of the soul as much as foie gras is food for the body, no? From the Sacred to the Profane, this contemplation of the beauty which we create with our minds and hands does indeed lead us to a higher path of thinking. Feeling good about yourself means you look good, no matter what you are wearing. 

It is my belief, however, that the man who is unencumbered by the contemplation of beauty will fall into the path of animal lust, where having is less important than the getting. This, to me, is the danger of overmaterialism - we will value a thing because of the name or price tag attached to it, not because it is beautiful in and of itself. This is a dangerous trap. It is my hope, Maestro Manolo, that through your blogging you will help enlighten us (as you have certainly enlightened me) as to the true natures of beauty - regardless of price or name or place of manufacture. 

Maestro Manolo, you have also served the double purpose of renewing my faith in the strangers of this world, for if you &amp; I may question and answer each other without the loss of ego, then perhaps the basic sense of the camaraderie of man is not lost. Thank you for answering my question without attacking or feeling attacked. 

I agree with your other friends who have said, enough of this! Give us pretty shoes!  Forgo this contemplation of beauty, and get to the beauty itself! 

No tengo nada pero gran respeto para usted. 

And, if I see that horror Lagerfeld stalking the streets like some ravening beast spat from the bowels of Gehenna, I will give him your regards. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maestro Manolo, </p>
<p>Truly, again, we are most impressed with your skill with words. The appreciation for items of beauty, no matter what their providence, is something we both share. Beauty is the food of the soul as much as foie gras is food for the body, no? From the Sacred to the Profane, this contemplation of the beauty which we create with our minds and hands does indeed lead us to a higher path of thinking. Feeling good about yourself means you look good, no matter what you are wearing. </p>
<p>It is my belief, however, that the man who is unencumbered by the contemplation of beauty will fall into the path of animal lust, where having is less important than the getting. This, to me, is the danger of overmaterialism &#8211; we will value a thing because of the name or price tag attached to it, not because it is beautiful in and of itself. This is a dangerous trap. It is my hope, Maestro Manolo, that through your blogging you will help enlighten us (as you have certainly enlightened me) as to the true natures of beauty &#8211; regardless of price or name or place of manufacture. </p>
<p>Maestro Manolo, you have also served the double purpose of renewing my faith in the strangers of this world, for if you &amp; I may question and answer each other without the loss of ego, then perhaps the basic sense of the camaraderie of man is not lost. Thank you for answering my question without attacking or feeling attacked. </p>
<p>I agree with your other friends who have said, enough of this! Give us pretty shoes!  Forgo this contemplation of beauty, and get to the beauty itself! </p>
<p>No tengo nada pero gran respeto para usted. </p>
<p>And, if I see that horror Lagerfeld stalking the streets like some ravening beast spat from the bowels of Gehenna, I will give him your regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postmoderngirl</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>postmoderngirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>It is also worth mentioning that the movie Fight Club does not necessarily denigrate the owning of the things.  While the desire to constantly obtain more and more material items is mocked in the film, so is the opposite desie, the need to destroy.  If you watched the movie and thought that the Space Monkeys were the heroes, perhaps it is time to watch it again?  Empty consumerism is bad and so is empty destruction.  

The postmoderngirl loves the shoes, and she loves the Fight Club!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also worth mentioning that the movie Fight Club does not necessarily denigrate the owning of the things.  While the desire to constantly obtain more and more material items is mocked in the film, so is the opposite desie, the need to destroy.  If you watched the movie and thought that the Space Monkeys were the heroes, perhaps it is time to watch it again?  Empty consumerism is bad and so is empty destruction.  </p>
<p>The postmoderngirl loves the shoes, and she loves the Fight Club!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooper</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on articulating so clearly this philosophy of art, which I&#039;ve always advocated.  I&#039;m thoroughly impressed with the insight and astuteness of the Manolo, as well as his inexhaustible cleverness.  :)

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on articulating so clearly this philosophy of art, which I&#8217;ve always advocated.  I&#8217;m thoroughly impressed with the insight and astuteness of the Manolo, as well as his inexhaustible cleverness.  :)</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>The Manolo is a deep well of wisdom. I especially like his democratic approach to beauty and fashion - and the funny pictures of celebrities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Manolo is a deep well of wisdom. I especially like his democratic approach to beauty and fashion &#8211; and the funny pictures of celebrities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2005/03/22/consumerism-and-beauty/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>The Manolo has impressed me.  He makes me want to revive such antiquated terms as, &quot;gentleman,&quot;  and &quot;gracious living.&quot;  He makes me yearn for a life spent lounging in salons filled with beautiful art and talented musicians, clad in fine couture, pondering the marvelous musings of such philosophical gentlemen as the Manolo.  *sigh*  At least my cubicle has a window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Manolo has impressed me.  He makes me want to revive such antiquated terms as, &#8220;gentleman,&#8221;  and &#8220;gracious living.&#8221;  He makes me yearn for a life spent lounging in salons filled with beautiful art and talented musicians, clad in fine couture, pondering the marvelous musings of such philosophical gentlemen as the Manolo.  *sigh*  At least my cubicle has a window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

