Sasquatch

Manolo says, ayyyyyy! Look at those feets!

18 Responses to “Sasquatch”

  1. e October 26, 2005 at 11:47 am #

    Said feets appear to be different sizes, no?

  2. Zarba October 26, 2005 at 12:02 pm #

    Are those your feet or are you just happy to see me?

  3. Annalucia October 26, 2005 at 12:21 pm #

    Either the casting job was very poorly done, or the Branson has feet of different sizes, different shapes (the right foot has more of an arch than the left) and the crowded toes usually associated with the women who wear dress pumps too tight for their feet. However he appears in the photo to be in good spirits so she will assume that the odd feet are sensibly shod, and do not cause him any pain.

  4. Kathryn October 26, 2005 at 12:28 pm #

    Well, you know what they say about big feet…

  5. Rob D. October 26, 2005 at 12:56 pm #

    …Big shoes.

  6. jackie October 26, 2005 at 2:02 pm #

    you are just boring jackie from baltimore.

  7. kerryklove October 26, 2005 at 4:28 pm #

    Manolo…what about the boots of the winter for this year. I am taking a trip from the Coast of the West to the Apple of Bigness soon, and need to know how I can be walking around with my feet ensconced in the warmth and the fashion.

  8. Das Boots October 26, 2005 at 6:05 pm #

    I thought that they were the feets of the Sasquatch. My bad.

  9. Das Boots October 26, 2005 at 6:08 pm #

    Sigh. I promise to read the titles before I post. Again, my bad.

    muttermutter

  10. Lola October 26, 2005 at 6:52 pm #

    Well, Sir Richard certianly has big shoes to fill. But who’s foot is longer that his forearm? Maybe he had a surogate plaster caster?

  11. BAH October 26, 2005 at 9:26 pm #

    Dude needs a photofacial to get rid of all that redness in his face. THEN and only then will we work on the feets.

  12. VeddyVeddyBadAng October 27, 2005 at 7:58 am #

    As is the case when seeing a person naked for the first time, seeing a person’s feet makes them suddenly far less intimidating and powerful, and more human.

  13. Kourtney October 27, 2005 at 4:39 pm #

    VeddyVeddyBadAng, I don’t know if I agree… perhaps with men, because one so rarely sees the bare feets, but what of a woman’s foot, barely wrapped in the cords of a gladiator-stiletto? Although one can see feets, there is a certain subtext of (sexual) intimidation and power.
    Hmm. A point to ponder…

  14. Dogstew October 28, 2005 at 2:57 am #

    Maybe the feets is ugly. But, then, maybe that’s what the feets look like when they have kicked a whole lotta ass.

    And I know what that grin has been eating!

  15. desertwind October 28, 2005 at 3:27 am #

    Sir Richard announced today that he will be the first to walk across the pond.

  16. VeddyVeddyBadAng October 28, 2005 at 7:57 am #

    Yes, I meant men, for the feet. But for naked – either one applies.

  17. vyv October 29, 2005 at 1:17 am #

    um…why is he holding plaster casts of paris hilton’s feet?

  18. 12yo November 5, 2005 at 12:44 pm #

    i like tenni-shoes
    and flip flops
    high heels suc