Comments on: Don’t Hassel the Hoff! http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/ Manolo Loves the Shoes! Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:55:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Kat http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-452943 Kat Wed, 23 May 2007 23:04:59 +0000 http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-452943 Omg! First his book, now DHH week??? What more could a girl ask for? http://www.stmartins.com/dhhweek.html Omg! First his book, now DHH week??? What more could a girl ask for?

http://www.stmartins.com/dhhweek.html

]]> By: Queen Catherine of Arrogance http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-440151 Queen Catherine of Arrogance Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:40:44 +0000 http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-440151 We hope you noticed that if you preorder the book you can also get a deal on "The Hoff's" CD regarding entering his automobile. Even aristrocracy enjoys a bargain. Love your blog! We hope you noticed that if you preorder the book you can also get a deal on “The Hoff’s” CD regarding entering his automobile. Even aristrocracy enjoys a bargain. Love your blog!

]]> By: Manolo the Shoeblogger http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439840 Manolo the Shoeblogger Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:45:25 +0000 http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439840 Ayyyyyy! Once again the Manolo's spelling skills fail him! Many thanks to the NDC for pointing out this error. Ayyyyyy! Once again the Manolo’s spelling skills fail him!

Many thanks to the NDC for pointing out this error.

]]> By: NDC http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439834 NDC Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:36:59 +0000 http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439834 With all the due respect to The Manolo's super fantastic quippery, I must correct a linguistic error in the commentary of The Manolo today. It would be a "magnuM opus," not a "magnuS opus." In Latin the noun "opus" is of the neuter gender, so the modifying adjective must, likewise, be neuter. The nominative and accusative declensions for this neuter adjective are both "magnum." If "opus" were of the masculine gender, "magnus" would be appropriate. I had the occasion to use the four years of Latin I took during the secondary school days of long, long, long, long ago (the number of the 'longs' is the number of the decades, mirabile dictu) this week at work. Now for The Manolo as well! Mirabile dictu, indeed! With all the due respect to The Manolo’s super fantastic quippery, I must correct a linguistic error in the commentary of The Manolo today. It would be a “magnuM opus,” not a “magnuS opus.” In Latin the noun “opus” is of the neuter gender, so the modifying adjective must, likewise, be neuter. The nominative and accusative declensions for this neuter adjective are both “magnum.” If “opus” were of the masculine gender, “magnus” would be appropriate.

I had the occasion to use the four years of Latin I took during the secondary school days of long, long, long, long ago (the number of the ‘longs’ is the number of the decades, mirabile dictu) this week at work. Now for The Manolo as well! Mirabile dictu, indeed!

]]> By: Kate Cavendish http://shoeblogs.com/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439677 Kate Cavendish Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:20:54 +0000 http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/04/26/dont-hassel-the-hoff/#comment-439677 One can only hope that the Hoff has ordered "The Consolation of the Shoes." One can only hope that the Hoff has ordered “The Consolation of the Shoes.”

]]>