<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Black Tie?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514492</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514492</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this is the  formal look that has been appearing at the Oscars for the past few years:  tux jacket (can be shawl collar or revers), plain black tropical wool trousers, dress shirt and a discreet light silver or white necktie.

My husband, who owns a tux but requires an Act of Congress and/or constant nagging before he will consent to actually wear it, recently wore this combo at a wedding and I didn&#039;t hear one complaint from him all night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is the  formal look that has been appearing at the Oscars for the past few years:  tux jacket (can be shawl collar or revers), plain black tropical wool trousers, dress shirt and a discreet light silver or white necktie.</p>
<p>My husband, who owns a tux but requires an Act of Congress and/or constant nagging before he will consent to actually wear it, recently wore this combo at a wedding and I didn&#8217;t hear one complaint from him all night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514368</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514368</guid>
		<description>Representing the brainier part of the native Californian population, I would assume &quot;California black tie&quot; is meant to express something like &quot;California casual,&quot; which in my opinion generally refers to office attire that is professional but somewhat relaxed, such as tailored slacks, a simple shirt or blouse of good quality, professional AND fashionable shoes, a professional handbag, and no real need for a jacket.  Alternatively, the concept can refer to trouserlike jeans, often in a darker wash, that are always paired with a blazer or jacket, professional shoes, and terrific jewelry.  True &quot;California casual&quot; at the office may be considered to be the suitless suit, a look that is pulled together in order to make the wearer look smart but not stuffy, and certainly not buttoned up to the neck.

Therefore, I would assume &quot;California black tie&quot; is meant to express black tie without stuffiness: an airy, simple cocktail dress with open-toed sandals and a tux/suit without a cummerbund -- most likely without a tie, even.  So there it may be: a tux and a cocktail dress with no tie, no shoes, no socks, no stockings, no service, shuffling around on a beach and wondering how much the bride paid to get sand in her dress.

Emily Post it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Representing the brainier part of the native Californian population, I would assume &#8220;California black tie&#8221; is meant to express something like &#8220;California casual,&#8221; which in my opinion generally refers to office attire that is professional but somewhat relaxed, such as tailored slacks, a simple shirt or blouse of good quality, professional AND fashionable shoes, a professional handbag, and no real need for a jacket.  Alternatively, the concept can refer to trouserlike jeans, often in a darker wash, that are always paired with a blazer or jacket, professional shoes, and terrific jewelry.  True &#8220;California casual&#8221; at the office may be considered to be the suitless suit, a look that is pulled together in order to make the wearer look smart but not stuffy, and certainly not buttoned up to the neck.</p>
<p>Therefore, I would assume &#8220;California black tie&#8221; is meant to express black tie without stuffiness: an airy, simple cocktail dress with open-toed sandals and a tux/suit without a cummerbund &#8212; most likely without a tie, even.  So there it may be: a tux and a cocktail dress with no tie, no shoes, no socks, no stockings, no service, shuffling around on a beach and wondering how much the bride paid to get sand in her dress.</p>
<p>Emily Post it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemdiva</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514367</link>
		<dc:creator>gemdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514367</guid>
		<description>Maybe black tie with lettuce tomatoe &amp; mayo??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe black tie with lettuce tomatoe &amp; mayo??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514363</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514363</guid>
		<description>As another native Angelena, the T is also stumped. The T would guess that perhaps it is a polite way of saying one does not need to dress as formally as the Late Great Mrs. Astor would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another native Angelena, the T is also stumped. The T would guess that perhaps it is a polite way of saying one does not need to dress as formally as the Late Great Mrs. Astor would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura K</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514277</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514277</guid>
		<description>Like a California king mattress I suppose a California black tie is merely a little longer than a standard black tie....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a California king mattress I suppose a California black tie is merely a little longer than a standard black tie&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepinkeminence</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514263</link>
		<dc:creator>thepinkeminence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514263</guid>
		<description>Standard black tie, but no panties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standard black tie, but no panties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridey</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514260</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a native Angelena, and I have no clue what this might mean. As far as I know, &quot;black tie&quot; means the same thing in California as it does in Iowa or Washington, D.C. (Though deja pseu&#039;s suggestions are charmingly dead-on :) 

But I&#039;d suggest, if possible, contacting the people who coined this silly phrase and asking them (politely, of course) what on earth they&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a native Angelena, and I have no clue what this might mean. As far as I know, &#8220;black tie&#8221; means the same thing in California as it does in Iowa or Washington, D.C. (Though deja pseu&#8217;s suggestions are charmingly dead-on :) </p>
<p>But I&#8217;d suggest, if possible, contacting the people who coined this silly phrase and asking them (politely, of course) what on earth they&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bethany</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514241</guid>
		<description>Well, I had a Silicon Valley Exec. friend who showed up to wedding in a Hawaiian shirt, khaki shorts and flip flops. We were all appalled. Then again, I don&#039;t think there are any dress codes left in the Silicon Valley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I had a Silicon Valley Exec. friend who showed up to wedding in a Hawaiian shirt, khaki shorts and flip flops. We were all appalled. Then again, I don&#8217;t think there are any dress codes left in the Silicon Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deja pseu</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/comment-page-1/#comment-514240</link>
		<dc:creator>deja pseu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/08/20/california-black-tie/#comment-514240</guid>
		<description>The Deja, who is native Californian and current LALALand resident is stumped as well. If the invite originated in Hollywood, she would guess this means the appropriate black t-shirt with the adequately cool band logo on the front, and studded black leather accessories.  If the invitation is for Santa Monica, she would suggest the black silk yogatard with a rough-cut semi precious stone necklace.  Brentwood calls for a Tory Burch top. For Beverly Hills pull out the Prada, but for San Francisco, she would not even hazard a guess.  However because this is an outdoor art gala, one probably would not go too terribly wrong with something Eileen Fisher-ish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Deja, who is native Californian and current LALALand resident is stumped as well. If the invite originated in Hollywood, she would guess this means the appropriate black t-shirt with the adequately cool band logo on the front, and studded black leather accessories.  If the invitation is for Santa Monica, she would suggest the black silk yogatard with a rough-cut semi precious stone necklace.  Brentwood calls for a Tory Burch top. For Beverly Hills pull out the Prada, but for San Francisco, she would not even hazard a guess.  However because this is an outdoor art gala, one probably would not go too terribly wrong with something Eileen Fisher-ish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

