<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lagerfeld Does Playboy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: toad</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533815</link>
		<dc:creator>toad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533815</guid>
		<description>Is she thinking Brainsssssss or Brasssssss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is she thinking Brainsssssss or Brasssssss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toad</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533814</link>
		<dc:creator>toad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533814</guid>
		<description>A few Rolfhies in their diet coke perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few Rolfhies in their diet coke perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WendyB</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533774</link>
		<dc:creator>WendyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533774</guid>
		<description>BWAH! That comment made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BWAH! That comment made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533746</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533746</guid>
		<description>He must have to sedate them heavily to get them to pose. So, as a true professional, she's hiding the track marks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He must have to sedate them heavily to get them to pose. So, as a true professional, she&#8217;s hiding the track marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Berry</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533708</guid>
		<description>Why does it not surprise me that a German does the first necrophilia themed Playboy?

Also, were Lagerfeld's supporters dropped on their heads as children? (Y/Y)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it not surprise me that a German does the first necrophilia themed Playboy?</p>
<p>Also, were Lagerfeld&#8217;s supporters dropped on their heads as children? (Y/Y)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iopine</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533696</link>
		<dc:creator>iopine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533696</guid>
		<description>Good for us, but perhaps not good for the model. I'd say she looks appalled, but that would imply that she was "feeling" an emotion. Rather, I'd say she looks catatonic. Even better, I'll take the thread of the comment from "daisyj" one step further and say she looks 

undead.



What did he do to her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for us, but perhaps not good for the model. I&#8217;d say she looks appalled, but that would imply that she was &#8220;feeling&#8221; an emotion. Rather, I&#8217;d say she looks catatonic. Even better, I&#8217;ll take the thread of the comment from &#8220;daisyj&#8221; one step further and say she looks </p>
<p>undead.</p>
<p>What did he do to her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisyj.</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533689</link>
		<dc:creator>daisyj.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533689</guid>
		<description>Because, really, what do the readers of lad-mags enjoy more than to gaze at photos of depressed, angry corpses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because, really, what do the readers of lad-mags enjoy more than to gaze at photos of depressed, angry corpses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genevieve</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533670</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/lagerfeld-does-playboy/#comment-533670</guid>
		<description>Ayyyy!! Manolo, when this page loaded for me, all I could see was your title and the word "playboy" on the photo..

It was awful. Awful. Especially because I was eating lunch. Fortunately, he was the photographer, not the model, as you so rightly put it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayyyy!! Manolo, when this page loaded for me, all I could see was your title and the word &#8220;playboy&#8221; on the photo..</p>
<p>It was awful. Awful. Especially because I was eating lunch. Fortunately, he was the photographer, not the model, as you so rightly put it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
