<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose Shoes Wednesday&#8230;The Answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brava97</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535383</link>
		<dc:creator>Brava97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535383</guid>
		<description>The bra-less-ness, the thick legs stuffed into boots, the chunky bag hanging on the wrist... I'm surprised that no one has said that Ms. Taylor's head could be replaced by Britney's and we wouldn't know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bra-less-ness, the thick legs stuffed into boots, the chunky bag hanging on the wrist&#8230; I&#8217;m surprised that no one has said that Ms. Taylor&#8217;s head could be replaced by Britney&#8217;s and we wouldn&#8217;t know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Taylor, Fashion Icon? &#187; Manolo's Shoe Blog: Shoes, Fashion, Celebrity, and Manolo!</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535295</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Taylor, Fashion Icon? &#187; Manolo's Shoe Blog: Shoes, Fashion, Celebrity, and Manolo!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535295</guid>
		<description>[...] says, the picture of the Elizabeth Taylor, from the 1970s, in the white hot pants has convinced the Manolo to say the few words about Liz and her fashion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] says, the picture of the Elizabeth Taylor, from the 1970s, in the white hot pants has convinced the Manolo to say the few words about Liz and her fashion [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535195</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535195</guid>
		<description>You know - I just noticed Dick's white boots and coordinating white trousers with yet a veddy proper sport jacket and tie.  Killer!

Liz has a great handbag as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know - I just noticed Dick&#8217;s white boots and coordinating white trousers with yet a veddy proper sport jacket and tie.  Killer!</p>
<p>Liz has a great handbag as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemdiva</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535182</link>
		<dc:creator>gemdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535182</guid>
		<description>That was my era, but somehow I don't remember "hot pants" as being that short.  With the possible exception of Daisy Dukes.  These look a bit tacky even for that time frame.  However, I must give La Liz props for the way she struts her stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my era, but somehow I don&#8217;t remember &#8220;hot pants&#8221; as being that short.  With the possible exception of Daisy Dukes.  These look a bit tacky even for that time frame.  However, I must give La Liz props for the way she struts her stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridey</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535145</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535145</guid>
		<description>Man, that was a tacky time. But she's still gorgeous, even in this pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that was a tacky time. But she&#8217;s still gorgeous, even in this pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535112</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/wordpress/2007/10/10/whose-shoes-wednesdaythe-answer-21/#comment-535112</guid>
		<description>Hot pants were an early 70's things, so I guess she was in her late 30's in this photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot pants were an early 70&#8217;s things, so I guess she was in her late 30&#8217;s in this photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
