<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoes of the Future = Backward Heels!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mable</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564431</link>
		<dc:creator>Mable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564431</guid>
		<description>So THAT is where Madonna got the idea for the cone bra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So THAT is where Madonna got the idea for the cone bra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lady coveted</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564070</link>
		<dc:creator>lady coveted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564070</guid>
		<description>so the future is now after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the future is now after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564018</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564018</guid>
		<description>Man oh Manischewitz, did they ever nail it with the phone! And I rather liked the wedding dress, except for the halo-effect headpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man oh Manischewitz, did they ever nail it with the phone! And I rather liked the wedding dress, except for the halo-effect headpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poochie</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564017</link>
		<dc:creator>Poochie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564017</guid>
		<description>Did you see these - 
http://shoedaydreams.blogspot.com/2007/11/vintage-inspiration.html

You can own them if you hurry!

I too laughed at "Oooh, swish!"  I think I'm going to start saying that.

But the pockets with "candies for cuties" were a little cree-py!
Luv
Poochie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see these -<br />
<a href="http://shoedaydreams.blogspot.com/2007/11/vintage-inspiration.html" rel="nofollow">http://shoedaydreams.blogspot.com/2007/11/vintage-inspiration.html</a></p>
<p>You can own them if you hurry!</p>
<p>I too laughed at &#8220;Oooh, swish!&#8221;  I think I&#8217;m going to start saying that.</p>
<p>But the pockets with &#8220;candies for cuties&#8221; were a little cree-py!<br />
Luv<br />
Poochie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eowyn_2</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564016</link>
		<dc:creator>eowyn_2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564016</guid>
		<description>Hehe "Oooh swish!" indeed.  And the designer who had the audacity to say that skirts might disappear entirely... shocking.  

Did anyone else notice that the men had all the uncomfortable parts of their fashion removed (collars, ties) and had practical additions (phone, pockets) while the women were still trussed, behatted and completely useless for anything other than standing there?

Granted, the women didn't look as ridiculous as he did.  But still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe &#8220;Oooh swish!&#8221; indeed.  And the designer who had the audacity to say that skirts might disappear entirely&#8230; shocking.  </p>
<p>Did anyone else notice that the men had all the uncomfortable parts of their fashion removed (collars, ties) and had practical additions (phone, pockets) while the women were still trussed, behatted and completely useless for anything other than standing there?</p>
<p>Granted, the women didn&#8217;t look as ridiculous as he did.  But still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z.</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564015</link>
		<dc:creator>Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-564015</guid>
		<description>"Oooh, swish!" LOL, love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oooh, swish!&#8221; LOL, love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan H.</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-563897</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-563897</guid>
		<description>What's funny is how right some of these ideas were, perhaps not in the exact executions shown, but in the concepts themselves.  We do have garments with zip-off sleeves and pant legs, but they're strictly limited to outdoorsy stuff (at least I hope so.)  The one that really got me laughing was the man's outfit, though, that showed him with the phone and the radio, etc.  Doesn't Dockers (or someone) make pants with special cargo pockets for all a guy's electronics?  

There's nothing new under the sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s funny is how right some of these ideas were, perhaps not in the exact executions shown, but in the concepts themselves.  We do have garments with zip-off sleeves and pant legs, but they&#8217;re strictly limited to outdoorsy stuff (at least I hope so.)  The one that really got me laughing was the man&#8217;s outfit, though, that showed him with the phone and the radio, etc.  Doesn&#8217;t Dockers (or someone) make pants with special cargo pockets for all a guy&#8217;s electronics?  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing new under the sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-563895</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/11/26/shoes-of-the-future-backward-heels/#comment-563895</guid>
		<description>This is was the best.  Thanks. I love the fashion film reels and I have a 70s version of the backward/cantilever/floating heel:
http://www.debutanteclothing.com/shop/item.php?item_id=242&#38;category_id=50

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is was the best.  Thanks. I love the fashion film reels and I have a 70s version of the backward/cantilever/floating heel:<br />
<a href="http://www.debutanteclothing.com/shop/item.php?item_id=242&amp;category_id=50" rel="nofollow">http://www.debutanteclothing.com/shop/item.php?item_id=242&amp;category_id=50</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
