<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Manolo Blahnik Shoes For Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Rosenthal</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-566197</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Rosenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-566197</guid>
		<description>Poor Noga- I think the majority of us realized that you didn't mean anything by your post and understand your feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Noga- I think the majority of us realized that you didn&#8217;t mean anything by your post and understand your feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565441</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565441</guid>
		<description>This shows that the Blahnik has NO EXCUSE for his preposterous proposition for the footwear for the mens.  I must think it was some kind of grand joke on his part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shows that the Blahnik has NO EXCUSE for his preposterous proposition for the footwear for the mens.  I must think it was some kind of grand joke on his part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565336</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565336</guid>
		<description>There was nothing snide in my remarks. They were made in the best of spirit, a democratic spirit of bonhomie and sincerity, as it should be among friends. And I consider Manolo an internet friend whom I will continue to visit and tease from time to time, for he is the true gentleman imminently tolerant of the occasional heretic. 

 If you read snide and bitter into my words, you must be projecting, dear person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was nothing snide in my remarks. They were made in the best of spirit, a democratic spirit of bonhomie and sincerity, as it should be among friends. And I consider Manolo an internet friend whom I will continue to visit and tease from time to time, for he is the true gentleman imminently tolerant of the occasional heretic. </p>
<p> If you read snide and bitter into my words, you must be projecting, dear person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565325</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565325</guid>
		<description>Why, no, Noga; the Manolo has not hired me as "this blog's bouncer."  However, if you are going to fill his blog with your bitterness, then you have to expect that some of his readers will take issue with your posts, and I am not the only one who has done so.  You apparently have your own agenda here, as you choose to ignore valid points in favor of continuing to complain and make snide remarks.  The source of any "friction" between you and other commenters (which, like Bridey, I never noticed before) is quite obvious, and it has nothing to do with your socioeconomic status.  Have a nice day.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why, no, Noga; the Manolo has not hired me as &#8220;this blog&#8217;s bouncer.&#8221;  However, if you are going to fill his blog with your bitterness, then you have to expect that some of his readers will take issue with your posts, and I am not the only one who has done so.  You apparently have your own agenda here, as you choose to ignore valid points in favor of continuing to complain and make snide remarks.  The source of any &#8220;friction&#8221; between you and other commenters (which, like Bridey, I never noticed before) is quite obvious, and it has nothing to do with your socioeconomic status.  Have a nice day.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565320</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565320</guid>
		<description>Cat: Has Manolo hired you as this blog's bouncer? If you don't like my comments just skip them when you see my name. There. Problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cat: Has Manolo hired you as this blog&#8217;s bouncer? If you don&#8217;t like my comments just skip them when you see my name. There. Problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565313</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565313</guid>
		<description>Noga, perhaps you should find another blog that is more to your liking, rather than coming here to complain about expensive shoes and the people who like them.  As has been pointed out by other commenters, you are surely not the only reader who cannot afford many of the beautiful shoes the Manolo posts for our viewing pleasure.  Some of the Manolo's readers can afford them, and those who cannot afford them still enjoy looking at them.  It is beyond me why you have a problem with this.  This is a blog for people who enjoy looking at beautiful shoes.  If you don't enjoy looking at them, then nobody is forcing you to come here.

It's sort of like going to a museum.  Most of us could never afford to purchase a genuine Picasso or Rembrandt, or the Hope diamond, or an imperial Faberge egg, but that doesn't mean we cannot enjoy looking at them.

Finally, just because a person can afford to buy expensive shoes does not mean that he or she is superficial, snooty, or a bad person, as you seem to imply.  I think that most of us tend to pay for the best quality items that we can afford, and there is nothing wrong with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noga, perhaps you should find another blog that is more to your liking, rather than coming here to complain about expensive shoes and the people who like them.  As has been pointed out by other commenters, you are surely not the only reader who cannot afford many of the beautiful shoes the Manolo posts for our viewing pleasure.  Some of the Manolo&#8217;s readers can afford them, and those who cannot afford them still enjoy looking at them.  It is beyond me why you have a problem with this.  This is a blog for people who enjoy looking at beautiful shoes.  If you don&#8217;t enjoy looking at them, then nobody is forcing you to come here.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of like going to a museum.  Most of us could never afford to purchase a genuine Picasso or Rembrandt, or the Hope diamond, or an imperial Faberge egg, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we cannot enjoy looking at them.</p>
<p>Finally, just because a person can afford to buy expensive shoes does not mean that he or she is superficial, snooty, or a bad person, as you seem to imply.  I think that most of us tend to pay for the best quality items that we can afford, and there is nothing wrong with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tendergirl</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565280</link>
		<dc:creator>tendergirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565280</guid>
		<description>beautiful selection!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful selection!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565273</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565273</guid>
		<description>I think I've extracted as much meaning as could be extracted from a pair of $1,275 boots. It's not much, but it's something, like this:

Have you seen the well-to-do up and down Park Avenue 
On that famous thoroughfare with their noses in the air 
High hats and Arrow collars white spats and lots of dollars 
Spending every dime for a wonderful time 

If you're blue and you don't know where to go to 
why don't you go where fashion sits, 
Puttin' on the ritz. 
Puttin' on the ritz. 
Puttin' on the ritz. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1RsWqNIIAA&#38;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve extracted as much meaning as could be extracted from a pair of $1,275 boots. It&#8217;s not much, but it&#8217;s something, like this:</p>
<p>Have you seen the well-to-do up and down Park Avenue<br />
On that famous thoroughfare with their noses in the air<br />
High hats and Arrow collars white spats and lots of dollars<br />
Spending every dime for a wonderful time </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re blue and you don&#8217;t know where to go to<br />
why don&#8217;t you go where fashion sits,<br />
Puttin&#8217; on the ritz.<br />
Puttin&#8217; on the ritz.<br />
Puttin&#8217; on the ritz. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1RsWqNIIAA&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1RsWqNIIAA&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565272</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565272</guid>
		<description>"Some readers who comment here are religiously serious about the greatness of the fashion designers that no heresy is allowed."

Noga, I think perhaps you are reading things into this blog which are not really here.  I've never seen comments here such as what you are describing -- certainly not to any noticeable extent.  I've seen both the Manolo and his readers bash some very expensive, yet ugly, designer shoes on many occasions.  I've also seen both the Manolo and his readers recommend some very superfantastic shoes well within your stated price range on many other occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some readers who comment here are religiously serious about the greatness of the fashion designers that no heresy is allowed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Noga, I think perhaps you are reading things into this blog which are not really here.  I&#8217;ve never seen comments here such as what you are describing &#8212; certainly not to any noticeable extent.  I&#8217;ve seen both the Manolo and his readers bash some very expensive, yet ugly, designer shoes on many occasions.  I&#8217;ve also seen both the Manolo and his readers recommend some very superfantastic shoes well within your stated price range on many other occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phalene</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565267</link>
		<dc:creator>Phalene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2007/12/10/the-real-manolo-blahnik-shoes-for-men/#comment-565267</guid>
		<description>The funny part about this blog is that I got the impression the readership was mostly people who -couldn't- afford these shoes. Otherwise we'd be gathered in a chic bistro somwhere, lunching and comparing our shoes in that polite, non-price tag saying way that's meant to imply that if you have to ask you can't afford it.

I mean, I thought $50 was a lot for shoes, and the people saying more than that was reasonable normally scared the pants off me. I read here to get a sense of what the platonic ideal of a shoe is, so I can daydream of the potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny part about this blog is that I got the impression the readership was mostly people who -couldn&#8217;t- afford these shoes. Otherwise we&#8217;d be gathered in a chic bistro somwhere, lunching and comparing our shoes in that polite, non-price tag saying way that&#8217;s meant to imply that if you have to ask you can&#8217;t afford it.</p>
<p>I mean, I thought $50 was a lot for shoes, and the people saying more than that was reasonable normally scared the pants off me. I read here to get a sense of what the platonic ideal of a shoe is, so I can daydream of the potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
