<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose Shoes Wednesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Shoes!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Atari</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566289</link>
		<dc:creator>Atari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566289</guid>
		<description>That awkward stance with the black boot catsuit screams "Emma Peel" to me, so I'll throw Diana Rigg in there. She's probably been guessed, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That awkward stance with the black boot catsuit screams &#8220;Emma Peel&#8221; to me, so I&#8217;ll throw Diana Rigg in there. She&#8217;s probably been guessed, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566286</guid>
		<description>I'm guessing Diana Rigg too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing Diana Rigg too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Dowager</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566284</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Dowager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566284</guid>
		<description>Diana Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diana Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renée</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566281</link>
		<dc:creator>Renée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566281</guid>
		<description>Ann Margret ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Margret ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phyllis</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566280</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566280</guid>
		<description>Big Bird?  Woodstock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Bird?  Woodstock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridey</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566279</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566279</guid>
		<description>Gotta be Faye. Those '30s-style shoes are actually very flattering on long, skinny feet, aren't they?

And Victor's right: It's all context. That vinyl boot-leggings bit with the Pan-Am logo bag would have been the absolute height of celebrity It-ness in its day. Goldie Hawn would've worn them. So much fashion looks silly in retrospect, but it's fun and mostly harmless. 

Someday extremely low-riding jeans will go out the way of leggings and French-cut T-shirts, if they haven't already -- as will tattoos, though those are a wee bit harder to abandon when the look becomes passe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta be Faye. Those &#8217;30s-style shoes are actually very flattering on long, skinny feet, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>And Victor&#8217;s right: It&#8217;s all context. That vinyl boot-leggings bit with the Pan-Am logo bag would have been the absolute height of celebrity It-ness in its day. Goldie Hawn would&#8217;ve worn them. So much fashion looks silly in retrospect, but it&#8217;s fun and mostly harmless. </p>
<p>Someday extremely low-riding jeans will go out the way of leggings and French-cut T-shirts, if they haven&#8217;t already &#8212; as will tattoos, though those are a wee bit harder to abandon when the look becomes passe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566277</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566277</guid>
		<description>Hey, folks, please remember if it *is* Miss Dunaway, her career started in the '60's, and there were some pretty funky things in fashion back then! But they look great in that context.

Forty years from now, our kids will be looking back on what *we* wore, you know.
*shudder*
Good gravy. There are some pix I need to remove from teh interwebs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, folks, please remember if it *is* Miss Dunaway, her career started in the &#8217;60&#8217;s, and there were some pretty funky things in fashion back then! But they look great in that context.</p>
<p>Forty years from now, our kids will be looking back on what *we* wore, you know.<br />
*shudder*<br />
Good gravy. There are some pix I need to remove from teh interwebs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obi's Sister</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566276</link>
		<dc:creator>Obi's Sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566276</guid>
		<description>Faye Dunaway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faye Dunaway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Diva</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566275</link>
		<dc:creator>The Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566275</guid>
		<description>So many fashion "don'ts", so little time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many fashion &#8220;don&#8217;ts&#8221;, so little time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lady coveted</title>
		<link>http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566274</link>
		<dc:creator>lady coveted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoeblogs.com/2008/01/09/whose-shoes-wednesday-38/#comment-566274</guid>
		<description>i *third* the big bird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i *third* the big bird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
